Workflow skill
Brainstorm Skill
Generate, challenge, and narrow ideas, from a simple baseline to three strong picks.
On this page
Install command
AI DevKit installs its built-in skills as one curated set. Run this once to install brainstorm with the rest of the built-in workflow skills.
npx ai-devkit@latest skill add --built-inWhat it does
Use brainstorm when you want options before committing: product ideas, technical approaches, names, content angles, or decisions. It frames the goal, starts from the simplest honest baseline, explores distinct options, challenges assumptions and over-engineering, and converges on three picks with a next step.
When to use it
- Compare technical approaches before writing a design
- Pressure-test an idea for weak assumptions and failure modes
- Generate and narrow names, content angles, or experiment ideas
Supported agents
- Claude Code
- Codex
- Cursor
- opencode
- Gemini CLI
The SKILL.md file
This is what your agent reads when the skill runs. View it on GitHub (opens in a new tab)
Run a compact diverge-to-converge loop.
Workflow#
- Frame: goal, constraints, audience, success criteria, assumptions.
- Baseline: state the simplest honest solution first. Every option must beat it; the baseline stays a candidate.
- Diverge: distinct options across practical, high-leverage, and unusual angles.
- Challenge: weak assumptions, failure modes, tradeoffs, rejections. Always: reject speculative generality (each abstraction, layer, flag, and data copy needs a current caller) and verify load-bearing "needed" claims in the consuming code, not doc assertions.
- Compare: only relevant criteria, plus deletion cost (how easily the option can be removed later). Ties go to the smaller option.
- Converge: strongest 3 picks with rationale and a next step. Self-review first: for each new constant, object, layer, and flag ask "why do we need this?" Cut answers that are only messaging or future-proofing.
Formats#
Use Quick by default. Use Deep only for ambiguous or high-stakes decisions. Ask at most one clarifying question only if missing context would materially change the brainstorm; otherwise state assumptions and proceed.
- Quick: clusters, challenges, 3 picks.
- Deep: assumptions, clusters, evaluation table, recommendation.
- Naming: tone groups, fit, ambiguity, pronunciation.
- Technical: approaches, tradeoffs, risks, validation.
- Content: angles, hooks, audiences, outlines.
Avoid filler, near-duplicates, generic best practices, premature recommendations, and scope without a current caller. If asked for more ideas, explore a new axis before listing variants.